Connect with us

Opinion

Akintola through the prism of the Yoruba value system

Published

on

File photo of Chief Adeniyi Akintola SAN

The imaginatively presented material below is basically about the Yoruba worldview. Within the invaluable Yoruba system the whole lifecycle is fractionalised into accomplishable bits. The system is hierarchical, therefore the order of achievement is natural and sensible.

The cart is not placed before the horse hence the inherent discipline in the lives of those that have passed through this system and the reverse in the lives of those who failed to imbibe these principles. It has nothing to do with age, it is a cultural element that those who failed to imbibe live to regret because they always stick out like sore thumbs everywhere they found themselves.

Not so for  Chief Adeniyi Akintola. He is always flying the Yoruba flag in character and learning.

Please spare some time to review this write up on the Yorubas that the writer has kindly permitted us to share and the additional  materials that we’ve chalked up on the erudite Yoruba man.

In Yorubaland, money has never been foremost in Yoruba value system. In our value system money is number six.

What are the first five you may ask?

1. The first is làákà’yè – The application of knowledge, wisdom & understanding… (Ogbón and ìmò òye)

2. The second is Ìwà Omolúàbí– (integrity) Someone with integrity is a man/woman of their words. If you have all the wealth in the world but lack integrity, you are not worth a thing. Integrity is combined with iwa, (character) which we regard as Omolúàbí.

3. The third is Akínkanjú or Akin – (Valour)

That is why Balóguns is second-in-command to the leaders in Yoruba land.

Balóguns are people that can lead them to war. To lead with great courage in the face of danger, especially in battle. Yoruba people have no respect for cowards.

4. The fourth is Anísélápá tí kìíse òle –  (Having a visible means of livelihood) A person must be identified with a visible means of livelihood that guarantees a lawful income or sustenance. His or her profession or job must be open and legally approved by society, and not through cheating or forcefulness.

5. The fifth is iyi – (Honour) Yoruba people place a premium on the gait with which individuals carry themselves and public reputation.

That is why Yorùbá people usually say when you set out to look for money and you meet honour on the way then you don’t need the journey anymore, because if you get the money, you will still use it to buy honour.

6. The last in the Yorùbá value system is owó tàbí orò – (Money or wealth) If putting money ahead of the other five, then you are nobody in Yoruba land of the olden days. Unfortunately, this is being pushed to the back burner nowadays due to the erosion of our value system.

After all his struggle to acquire the golden fleece. He graduated with a law degree, appeared in Court for the first time in borrowed gown and head gear but forged ahead anyways. He got a job that offered a Santana car and 400 naira (huge sum at the time) where the regular lawyers earned between 180 and 220 but his adopted father asked whether he wanted to learn law practice or run after money.

He gave him the freedom to choose. Remembering his Yoruba upbringing, he went for the 220 naira job but learnt the best court presentations and law application available at that time. The rest is history as he’s one of the most sought after legal minds and administrator today.

Let’s read more about the Chief…

NIYI AKINTOLA: A man on a mission

Having a goal in life and achieving it will seem to be the norm for all human beings. But having a goal would seem to be, under close scrutiny, the dream of a person who’s got everything lined up for them.

Think about it, if survival for the day is your preoccupation as an indigent child, what time is there to dream talkless set a goal ?! But if you’re guided by unseen hands and every decision you take, to break the cycle of poverty, works like a cinch even when it obviously seem impossible given your position and background to achieve the heights you have attained in life you’ll definitely know you have a date with destiny.

Three primary schools, mechanic apprenticeship, plank seller motor-boyship and photostudio apprenticeship filling in for your high school education. And through hardwork you threw all that into the trash ( retaining the lessons) to clear all required WASCE papers at one sitting.

Within a blurring moment you also clinched A-B-A in WAEC A- Level and another A-B-A same year in Cambridge A-Level examinations. You attracted via the media sponsors from an elite Ibadan club who saw you through University of Ibadan studying law having rejected sociology offered through JAMB by Ife 2 years earlier. You became a Senior Advocate in your chosen profession and member of body of benchers relatively young.

Definitely you’re a special individual and most certainly providence has an interest in you and everything you touch.

CONSUMMATE PROFESSIONAL

The Bible says “Seest thou a man who is diligent in his work….he shall stand before kings and not before ordinary men”.

Talking about professional conduct, you do not need rocket science to conclude that a Senior Advocate of Nigeria got that far because they’ve given a good account of themselves inside and outside of the court rooms elevating the course of their calling everywhere they go. Niyi AKINTOLA SAN took a lot from his profession and he has by all means given so much back in terms of record setting and becoming something of a reference point in the resolution of complicated litigations.

If you care to look , check the outcome of some landmark cases some of which he did without receiving any remuneration.

AKINTOLA was lead counsel in the celebrated Inakoju vs Adeleke case which was a notable case in the history of Nigerian legal jurisprudence. AKINTOLA in that case believed that the law should be used as an instrument of social engineering and change to better the lot of society.

Even when some of his  colleagues and senior members of the bar believed he was walking along the wrong path challenging the impeachment of Chief Ladoja in the courts of law. He proved that he knew the horse he was betting on by cleverly changing the mode of challenge. He made the legislators sue themselves and made the speaker of the house of assembly the arrow head of the challenge.

The approach of AKINTOLA SAN on impeachment proceedings has now become the reference point as was evident in subsequent impeachment proceedings in Plateau , Ekiti, and Bayelsa states to mention a few.

The traiblaising traits can be found on the Ilero chieftaincy stool case where the Alaafin and the kingmakers were against government’s imposition of a candidate against the traditionally chosen one. He won the case for the people in spite of all the stumbling blocks including the sudden death of a major witness.

AKINTOLA did his work with the fear of God and deep considerations for humanity. He had been at the two extremes of life. He had nothing, starting out and he’s now within the top echelon of his career. He’s very sensitive when it comes to people’s welfare probably because of his personal experiences and also passionate about uplifting the indigents most especially those experiencing issues with education but not limited to that.

He’s easily on the card at most intellectual gatherings within and outside the law profession. His  law qualification and understanding of arbitration has taken him to other lands to work with resounding success  just like he’s doing at home.

HIS ACTIVISM AND PHILANTHROPY

Niyi Akintola SAN’s OYO and Ibadan Origins are never in question. And like the adage says “a leaf does not fall far away from the tree” The gene of fighting for a just cause that the Ibadan people are known for runs in his veins. He’s a great great great grandson of Ibikunle the fiery army general that protected OYO empire from the Kunrunmi rebellion within,  In Orile Ijaye and external aggression against Yorubas generally.

Akintola has been in the trenches with human rights activists from his school days but very actively since the June 12 debacle. His mantra has been ” injustice done to one is injustice done to all.

He was herded into detention by the powerfuls together with some human rights lawyers, trade unionists, progressive politicians and journalists like Gani Fawehinmi, NLC man Bolomope, Femi Falana, Lam Adesina to mention a few. They were either asking for improved education, health and freedom for the people. It was never about personal aggrandizement.

He was the deputy speaker in 1992. Because he dared to oppose the ” this is how we’ve been doing it people ” the kingpin of Amala-Politics himself,  Lamidi Adedibu ordered his arrest using his foot soldiers to throw the second most powerful lawmaker in the state for that time in the booth of a car and driven to Molete. And as if the absurdity of this lawless behaviour was not grevious enough, the politics by other means mafioso sternly warned him to desist from his activism or he will be dealt with.

He carried on his activism in the courts of law by choosing to use the law as an instrument to get justice for the common man and even for the well to do like governor Ladoja who was crudely removed from power.

Charity begins at home they say, Chief Akintola is at home in the courts of law and so his charitable activities takes root even from there by taking cases of indigent clients free of charge.

Niyi Akintola, SAN was lifted up by kind hearted people, consequently he has assisted many and still assisting many others in their educational pursuits

because he believes knowledge is power.

Only recently he promised the burnt down Ibadan motor Spare parts market traders 10 lockup shops and he delivered to the amazement of the owners shops painted, with better doors and toilets.

His philanthropic work also crosses over into his politics. All political cases he had taken on for the progressives and they are many  from the Local government to governorship to the lower and upper houses to presidential were done free of charge. Show me any other party man doing the same standing today.

When we discuss his politics next you will get much more.

HIS PHILANTHROPY AND POLITICS.

I did say that Chief Adeniyi Akintola SAN did not have the opportunity of a secondary school education instead he learnt lessons of life from one apprenticeship to another (3 of them)and  at the end of the day by divine providence and hard work made the loss seem unnecessary.

Continuing with his philanthropic efforts from where we left off. Chief Akintola is a strong advocate of the philosophy that privileged citizens should give back to the communities that produced them but not by giving ridiculous half Kongos of rice and gari but by real empowerment that makes them fishermen themselves instead of getting pieces of fish in trickles, a feudalistic shenanigan that makes them perpetual slaves.

* He built an edifice tagged Tunji Bello Hall at the school of nursing Eleyele Ibadan for the Muslim Society Oyo State though himself a Baptist. He practices what he preaches.

* I had witnessed a prayer session at the Oja Oba, Ibadan central mosque where he honoured an invitation to a prayer session by the Imams and Alfas of Yoruba land.

* He built the Magistrate court, and joined in the effort to build a

* Police station in his native Omi Adio, his ancestors farmstead.

* He also built a well equipped hospital in that community, being managed by the Baptist Church and as we speak there’s no other elaborate health structure of it’s type in the area. In fact, the hospital was commissioned in 2006 by Asiwaju Bola Tinubu.

* Chief Akintola had donated to the Federal Government also a parcel of land(3 plots) for a health facility in the area.

*  The Baptist convention had also been allocated huge  (27 hectares) of land for the Bowen University Teaching Hospital Annexe.

So when eventually all these other facilities come on stream through the effort of Adeniyi Akintola SAN, the Omi Adio environment would be a bastion of health facilities.

* At 50, he awarded 50 indigent higher institution students scholarship.

* He instituted a scholarship scheme for Ibadan indigenes( apart from others) at Lautech University , Ogbomosho – under the chairmanship of Oluyole club of Ogbomosho. The scholarship programme still runs today.

*Myriads of unpublicized, solid, market women empowerments, hence the strong women support base in all local governments.

Now to his politics. He is one of the few progressives still standing in Oyo State since Bola Ige era.

He is a principled progressive whose ideology thrives on positive programmes for the people and not on fithy lucre as has become  of the dye in wool political hermaphrodites who run with the hares and hunt with the hounds.

He makes friends across party lines and hierarchy but draws the line on principles. He’s a fantastic negotiator because of his background in arbitration. There’s no losing with Niyi because he listens to all very carefully and appropriately thrash out all issues ( everyone is happy).

Unlike most people of his status he answers virtually all telephone calls. That is a culture of civility lacking among  Nigeria’s high and mighty.

He was member Oyo State House of Assembly in the 3rd republic in 1992. As a matter of fact he was deputy Speaker.

He was harrased by the Adedibu political machinery. Undaunted he resigned from deputy Speakership and went back to law. He’s about the only politician in Nigeria’s history who has resigned from office on principles.

He was, during the tenure in the 3rd republic chairman Committee on Public Petitions and Judiciary.

He was a member presidential Committee on The Review of The 1999 constitution.

He’s currently a legal adviser/ counsel  to his party – The APC and had been representing the progressives legally since 1998.

He was the dissenting voice that single handedly wrote the minority report on resource control for the 1999 presidential Committee on the review of the constitution.

He’s on the national committee planning the 2023 elections campaign for his party. One of the 3 from Oyo State.

HIS POLITICS AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPERIENCES.

The Yorubas believe that you need to ” show me the apparel you’re donning if you must gift me a dress”.

Those aspiring to high offices must have a history of excellent administrative capacities to show how society has benefitted from their wealth of experiences in the past. Charity begins at home. Chief Akintola runs 4 fully functional chambers in Nigeria ( Ibadan, Lagos, Abuja and Portharcourt) and collaborates with others elsewhere in the world.Because of his professional prowess public and private organizations have entrusted him with the management of sensitive and delicate issues not just in the courts and he has delivered beyond  expectations.

He consults for wholly owned Nigerian companies and multinationals, government parastatals, financial institutions, oil and gas companies including construction and manufacturing concerns. You’ll agree  with me that a dodderer can’t smell these environments talkless function effectively there.

It is therefore not surprising that a versatile individual like Adeniyi AKINTOLA SAN has served his fatherland, the world and the legal profession in so many capacities among which are being:

*Appointed counsel to the Federal Government on the Judicial Commission of Inquiry  that probed Nigerdock N81 Billion fraud.

*Appointed Member Presidential visitation panel  to FUTA I999-2000

*Member Body of Benchers- The highest governing body of the legal profession. And he  is a life bencher, the youngest to become so at 50.

*Director Nigerian Reinsurance PLC

*Member Disciplinary Committee of the NBA( since 1998).

* Past Chairman NBA Ibadan Branch.

*Fellow London Court of International Arbitration

*Appointed partner with the Alternative Dispute Resolution of London, Marriott West India Quay, London (2008) Also a manager at the ADR Seminar of 2008 in the United Kingdom.

*Fellow Chattered Institute of Arbitrators, Nigeria.

*Member 1999 Presidential Committee on the review of the Constitution.

*Member Nigeria Bar Association

*Member African Bar Association

*Member International Bar Association

An incorruptible fellow, he exposed the 50 million naira fraud at FUTA and rejected an allotment of land in 1992 by the FG in Abuja because it was tainted with corruption.

The staunch progressive that he is he believes in

* Quality education for the mass of our people

In Technical areas, Sciences,  ICT, Liberal arts, Agric chain,  Commerce and Trade.

* Robust health system with focus on the professionals,the masses, the infrastructure and medication.

*Infrastructural radicalization to answer multisectorial deficiencies in lifting the system out of the current doldrum and creating jobs.

*Provision of facilities for SMEs to encourage entrepreneurship.

And more… to be unveiled subsequently.

But even as it is, you will agree with me that he has fulfilled what is required of him to be called a seasoned Yoruba person but there’s more to be shown the world about this exemplar. Just stay tuned!

 

Mobolaji Oladepo, the media aide to Chief Adeniyi Akintola, sent this piece from Ibadan, Oyo state 

Comments

Opinion

Doctors’ Strike and the Price of Human Life | By Olusegun Hassan

Published

on

The popular Yoruba saying, “Ẹni kan l’ọmọ,” meaning that only the person wearing the shoes knows where they pinch, recently took on a deeper meaning for me. Just last week, I experienced its true significance beyond its familiar place as an aphorism.

Popular sayings often remain mere expressions in our consciousness until we find ourselves at the receiving end of the experiences they describe. Similarly, systemic flaws and structural deficiencies in society may seem distant until we become victims of them. News of kidnapping is just another newspaper report until a loved one is abducted and the family is thrown into a desperate search for money to pay a ransom. In the same vein, the news that “doctors are on strike” may appear to be just another headline until someone close to us dies because urgent medical attention was unavailable as a result of the strike.

Nigeria’s story is replete with such unfortunate experiences, which have given rise to another familiar expression: “May Nigeria not happen to you.”

While the media landscape was still reeling from reports of the death of popular gospel singer Toluwanisings, who reportedly died on October 14, 2026, following an alleged lack of urgent medical attention during a doctors’ strike, I also lost a close relative two days later, on October 16, under circumstances involving the same lack of timely medical care.

She was an asthma patient who suffered an attack in the middle of the night. After receiving first aid, she was rushed to the nearest hospital, a teaching hospital, only to be turned away because doctors were on strike and none was available to attend to her. By the time the family reached the nearest private hospital, she had died. Her death left the entire family, myself included, traumatised.

These are only two cases among many similar tragedies that have occurred over the years. They raise a painful question: how many of these deaths could have been prevented if essential medical services had remained accessible?

I cannot help but wonder: what is the value of human life in this country? At what point did the sanctity of human life become secondary to demands for improved welfare by medical unions?

This is not to suggest that the grievances of doctors are illegitimate. Far from it. Medical professionals deserve fair remuneration, adequate facilities, safe working conditions and an environment that enables them to perform their duties effectively. The question, however, is whether the pursuit of these legitimate demands should come at such a devastating cost to human life, particularly when the fundamental purpose of the medical profession is to preserve life through the provision of appropriate healthcare.

It is a troubling paradox.

Doctors undoubtedly have the right to demand fair treatment and safe working conditions. However, that right must be exercised in a manner that protects patients from abandonment and avoidable harm. When patients die because essential medical services have been withdrawn without adequate safeguards, the ethical justification for the action becomes a serious matter for scrutiny.

The World Medical Association (WMA), an international body that promotes widely recognised ethical standards for physicians, upholds principles that include respect for human life and the dignity of patients. These principles underscore the responsibility of doctors to protect the health and well-being of those under their care, provide competent and timely treatment, prevent avoidable harm and act in their patients’ best interests.

These are not merely ideals about compassion. They are professional obligations that must continue to guide medical decisions, including during industrial disputes.

In Nigeria, the Medical and Dental Council of Nigeria (MDCN) addressed this issue in January 2024, reportedly directing the heads of teaching hospitals, federal medical centres and specialised hospitals to ensure that industrial action did not result in the abandonment or premature discharge of patients.

Among the safeguards outlined were the following:

  • Accident and emergency departments must remain open and adequately staffed.
  • Emergency paediatric services, labour wards, neonatal units and intensive care units must continue to provide emergency and critical care.
  • Patients already admitted to hospital must not be discharged merely because a strike has commenced.
  • Patients with scheduled appointments before the strike must be attended to in accordance with the applicable directives.

These safeguards reinforce an important principle: the right to pursue employment-related demands does not extinguish a doctor’s professional obligation to protect patients from preventable harm.

Where emergency patients are turned away, critically ill patients are abandoned, or essential services are shut down without adequate arrangements for emergency care, the circumstances warrant investigation. Where evidence establishes a breach of professional obligations or applicable regulations, appropriate disciplinary or legal action should follow.

Similarly, when a patient dies after being denied emergency treatment during an industrial action, the circumstances surrounding the death deserve a thorough and impartial investigation. Where negligence, professional misconduct or a breach of applicable directives is established, appropriate sanctions should be imposed in accordance with the law and relevant professional regulations.

The point is simple: no legitimate grievance should justify abandoning a patient whose life is in immediate danger.

At this juncture, it is equally important to acknowledge the government’s share of the blame. While this article emphasises the ethical obligation of doctors to preserve human life, the government must also recognise that poor remuneration, unpaid allowances, inadequate medical facilities, excessive workloads and unsafe working conditions undermine doctors’ morale and their ability to provide quality healthcare.

The consequences are increasingly evident in Nigeria’s continuing loss of medical professionals to other countries.

In 2025, the Coordinating Minister of Health and Social Welfare, Professor Muhammad Ali Pate, reportedly disclosed that more than 16,000 Nigerian doctors had emigrated over the preceding five to seven years, largely in search of better opportunities abroad. Furthermore, a 2025 report on Nigeria’s health statistics reportedly indicated that 4,193 doctors and dentists left the country in 2024 alone.

These departures deepen staffing shortages, increase the pressure on the doctors who remain and expose patients to longer waiting times and potentially avoidable deaths.

The government must therefore move beyond repeated negotiations and implement sustainable reforms. These should include the prompt payment of salaries and allowances, improved working conditions, adequate funding for public hospitals, transparent career progression and the effective implementation of agreements reached with medical unions.

The Federal Ministry of Health and relevant hospital authorities must also strengthen monitoring and oversight during industrial disputes to ensure that emergency and critical care services remain available in public hospitals. Patients in life-threatening conditions must not be turned away simply because doctors are on strike.

Ultimately, responsibility for Nigeria’s healthcare crisis cannot be placed entirely on one side. Doctors must uphold their professional and ethical obligations, while the government must fulfil its responsibility to create conditions in which those obligations can be discharged effectively.

Medicine is not an ordinary occupation. It carries a profound moral responsibility because, in certain circumstances, the timely intervention of a medical professional can make the difference between life and death. No employment grievance should be used to justify abandoning a patient whose life is in immediate danger.

The sanctity of human life demands responsibility from the doctors entrusted with treating patients and from the government authorities responsible for ensuring that appropriate treatment remains available.

A functional healthcare system depends on cooperation between these two critical stakeholders. When they fail to find common ground, it is the ordinary citizen who suffers the consequences. As the familiar saying goes, when two elephants fight, the grass suffers.

And trust me, I know what that suffering feels like. I have just experienced it.

Olusegun Hassan, Ph.D.
Public Policy Analyst and Social Commentator

Continue Reading

Opinion

Oyo, Osun Petrol Price War: Why Fair Competition Should Matter 

Published

on

The decision by some filling stations in Oyo and Osun states to sell petrol at lower prices than their competitors has brought renewed attention to pricing practices in Nigeria’s downstream petroleum sector and, more importantly, to what consumers stand to gain when competition is allowed to work.

Investigations and enquiries into petrol prices in the two states revealed differences in pump prices, with some independent petroleum marketers (IPM) selling Premium Motor Spirit (PMS), popularly known as petrol, for about ₦1,375 per litre, while some competing stations charged about ₦1,385 per litre.

Although the difference is just ₦10 per litre, the savings are meaningful for motorists, commercial transport operators, artisans, traders and other residents who depend on petrol to earn a living.

For a commercial driver buying 40 litres, for instance, the price difference amounts to ₦400. For small businesses that rely on petrol-powered generators, repeated purchases at lower prices could provide some relief amid the rising cost of living. Across thousands of consumers and multiple purchases, modest savings can become a substantial reduction in household and business expenses.

However, findings from the enquiries suggest that some independent marketers who had previously sold petrol at relatively lower prices later adjusted their pump prices to match those of competing stations.

The development has prompted questions about what influences pricing decisions in the two states and whether consumers are being allowed to benefit fully from competition among petroleum marketers.

Information obtained during engagements with some marketers, who spoke on condition of anonymity, also indicated that the leadership of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN) in the two states had expressed displeasure over the decision by some members to sell petrol below the prices charged by other filling stations.

The circumstances surrounding the reported position of the association’s leadership, however, require clarification from the relevant IPMAN officials. Their response is necessary to establish the facts, understand the basis of the reported concerns and give the association an opportunity to state its position.

THE CASE FOR FAIR COMPETITION

At the heart of the matter is a question that directly affects consumers: should a petroleum marketer who can legitimately sell petrol at a lower price be discouraged from doing so simply because competitors are charging more?

The answer should be guided by evidence, legality and consumer welfare. In a competitive market, businesses generally make pricing decisions based on their operating costs, supply arrangements, margins and commercial objectives. Where a marketer can sustainably offer a lower price while meeting all applicable regulatory, product-quality and safety requirements, consumers should be able to consider that option.

Fair competition is not merely a benefit to individual buyers. It creates pressure on businesses to control costs, improve efficiency and offer better value. A lower price from one marketer can encourage others to review their own costs and pricing decisions, potentially producing wider benefits for customers.

This does not mean that every low-priced offer is automatically sustainable or that marketers should ignore the economic realities of running their businesses. Differences in supply costs, transportation, location and other expenses may legitimately result in different pump prices.

The issue, therefore, is not whether every filling station should sell petrol at the same price. It is whether businesses can compete fairly, transparently and within the law, without undue pressure to abandon commercially viable prices that benefit consumers.

Any intervention that prevents legitimate price competition should be supported by clear evidence and a lawful, consumer-focused justification. Otherwise, the likely result is a narrower range of choices and less pressure on sellers to offer better prices.

THE BURDEN ON ORDINARY RESIDENTS

For many households and small businesses, petrol prices go beyond what appears on a filling station’s price board. Higher fuel costs can increase transportation fares, the cost of moving goods and the expense of running generators and other equipment.

Traders may have to spend more transporting their goods to markets, while commercial drivers face pressure from rising operating costs. Such expenses can eventually be passed on to consumers through higher prices for goods and services.

Against this background, any legitimate opportunity to reduce fuel expenses deserves serious attention.

Allowing genuine competition among petroleum marketers could offer some relief, particularly where consumers have access to reliable information about prices and can choose where to buy their fuel. The ability to compare prices is itself an important part of a functioning market.

At the same time, price differences should be examined in context. A lower pump price alone does not establish wrongdoing by competing stations, just as a higher price does not automatically amount to exploitation. Reliable evidence about supply costs, market conditions and the conduct of the parties concerned is needed to reach a fair conclusion.

The central point remains clear: where lower prices are lawful, sustainable and supported by quality and safety compliance, consumers should not be deprived of the benefit merely because uniformity is more convenient for sellers.

STAKEHOLDERS MUST CLARIFY THE ISSUES

The reported concerns over lower pump prices in Oyo and Osun call for open engagement among IPMAN leadership, independent marketers and other relevant stakeholders.

IPMAN officials in both states should be given the opportunity to explain whether any concerns were raised about members selling petrol below prevailing local prices and, if so, the reasons behind those concerns.

Independent marketers, on their part, should be prepared to explain how they arrive at their pump prices and demonstrate that their pricing practices are commercially sustainable and comply with relevant requirements.

The relevant regulatory authorities also have a role to play in ensuring that petroleum products meet quality and safety standards and that market participants operate within the applicable legal framework. They should also remain alert to any conduct that unlawfully restricts competition or misleads consumers.

No stakeholder should be condemned solely on the basis of an unverified allegation. Equally, concerns that could affect consumers’ access to competitively priced fuel should not be dismissed without proper examination.

A balanced approach requires both scrutiny and restraint: lower prices should be tested against evidence, while attempts to suppress legitimate competition should also face appropriate questions.

CONSUMERS SHOULD NOT BE LEFT OUT

Ultimately, the debate over petrol prices in Oyo and Osun should not become a contest between filling station owners. The interests of consumers must remain central.

Petroleum marketers need a business environment in which they can operate sustainably, recover legitimate costs and earn reasonable returns. Consumers, however, also deserve a marketplace where they can make informed choices and benefit from genuine competition.

If a filling station can lawfully and sustainably sell quality petrol at a lower price, that decision should be assessed on its merits rather than opposed simply because neighbouring stations charge more. Competition should not be treated as a problem merely because it exposes differences in pricing.

The way forward lies in transparency, fair competition and constructive engagement among stakeholders.

For residents struggling with the cost of transportation, food and other necessities, even modest savings matter. Ensuring that legitimate competition is allowed to work could help ease some of that pressure, while proper oversight can protect consumers from unsafe products and unsustainable practices.

The relevant question is whether all parties are prepared to put a fair and transparent marketplace ahead of unnecessary disputes over pricing. Consumers should not be asked to pay more simply to preserve uniformity where lawful competition can deliver better value.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Governor Seyi Makinde’s Media Chat: A Hundred And Twenty Minutes Of Trash Talk | By Sola Abegunde

Published

on

I knew that Governor Makinde would provide us with a hundred and twenty minutes of comic relief and at the same time, I knew he is bound to commit unforced errors which would further expose his shenanigans.

The outgoing Governor of Oyo state did not disappoint on both fronts.

Personally, I understand the need for him to have one final valedictory Media Chat.

The atmosphere might be too hot for him to even think of such luxury after the general election in 2027. So, if he’s got the opportunity now, why not take a shot at it?

I must however say that the Governor displayed his insensitivity right from the choice of the Studio the Chat was aired.

Shortly before the Media Chat commenced, I came across a release signed by the Chairman of the Nigeria Union of Journalist, NUJ, BCOS Chapel, Com. Ademola Balogun.

Com. Balogun was full of lamentations concerning the very terrible state of the Oyo state Broadcasting Corporations, BCOS.

He was of the very strong opinion that the BCOS should have meaningful opportunities to cover Government activities.

He also called on Governor Seyi Makinde to empower the BCOS to invest in modern studio, transmitting equipment, digital broadcasting facilities and online platforms.

Com. Ademola spoke extensively about Staff welfare and other issues.

Sadly, while Governor Seyi Makinde has been consistent in empowering a particular Radio station, the Broadcasting Corporations of Oyo state, BCOS has been dying slowly.

Unfortunately, I have no good news for Com. Ademola. His lamentations will definitely fall on stone deaf ears. It is too late for Governor Makinde to change his ways. I just pray that the Governor would not wake up one day and sold off whatever remains of the Corporation.

That is just by the way. Let me address Governor Makinde’s Media Chat for whatever it is worth. The Governor spent a whole two hours venting anger and spreading outright lies and half-truths.

I am surprised that Governor Makinde has not seen any reason for him to have a second thought about his awkward and reckless comments about the Law Profession.

I am saying this because, for the second time, his Deputy was sitting closely beside him and yet, he felt like it was humorous for him to take a dig at Senator Sarafadeen Abiodun Alli, the All Progressives Congress, APC Gubernatorial candidate, regarding his misconceived failure as a Law practitioner.

He repeated the ignorant and reckless comments about Senator Alli, not being a Senior Advocate of Nigeria and for that reason, according to Governor Seyi Makinde, the Oyo South Senator is not an accomplished Legal Practitioner.

He had made that same reckless comments a couple of weeks ago and at that time also, the Deputy Governor was beside him!

The respectable man is an accomplished Lawyer of many years of experience, who had trained a lot of successful Lawyers.

I also wonder, how people like Dr. Nureni Adeniran and Olasunkanmi Olaleye, who are also Lawyers and have been working with Governor Seyi Makinde over the years would feel about those reckless comments coming from their Boss.

If you want to follow Governor Seyi Makinde’s reasoning, if you are a teacher and you did not rise to the status of a School Principal or Head teacher, then, you’re a failure.

If you are a Military Personnel and you didn’t rise to the position of a General, you’re a failure!

Any time I saw the Governor arguing in this regard, I always asked myself if he was actually himself, because, for me, only a drunkard is capable of reasoning in that manner, or, perhaps, some young elements who had taken so much banned substances.

I have carefully analyzed the 120 minutes Media Chat and I saw that Governor Seyi Makinde spent so much time treating two issues.

The first, being his frustration about his perceived betrayal by president Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the second being his failed attempt to rewrite the Constitution of Nigeria regarding the financial autonomy for Local Governments.

The birthday boy tried to work him through the crisis at the Circular Road, but it was obvious that the main reasons behind Governor Makinde’s Media Chat were grounded on his firm beliefs that Tinubu breached certain agreements with him and others in 2023 and his warped opinion about how the Local Governments should operate within our Federation.

Let’s start with Governor Seyi Makinde’s allegations against Tinubu.

According to him, in 2023, an agreement was signed between certain individuals, including himself.

He said there was an agreement that a Government of National Unity would be formed by president Tinubu after he won the presidential election of 2023 and that he and the Governor of Lagos state, Babajide Sanwo-Olu were signatories to that agreement.

According to him, president Tinubu was not a signatory to the agreement but he was informed after the agreement was signed!

He went further to say that on the strength of that agreement, he presented Bimbo Adekambi as a Ministerial nominee because the president had earlier told him that he wanted to appoint the Minister for Budget and Planing from Oyo state.

To his chagrin and disappointment, president Tinubu settled for Bayo Adelabu and asked him to own the nomination of the former Minister for power, a request he claimed he rejected.

He therefore concluded that all the Ministers nominated from the South West are from Bourdilon.

I have carefully analyzed this confession by Governor Seyi Makinde and I have a few questions for him.

Why is it that Governor Seyi Makinde is the only one complaining about a breached agreement?

Why did it take him all these long to come out with this fact?

What was the criteria for the nomination of Bimbo Adekambi? Did he just take a random decision to choose Adekambi without a prior relationship between the two of them or what?

How does Governor Seyi Makinde want to convince any right thinking person that he believed an agreement would be binding on Tinubu on the strength of Governor Sanwo-Olu’s alleged signature?

For me, that doesn’t make any sense, most especially, for an ” accomplished Engr” like Seyi Makinde!

I am surprised that Governor Makinde leaves out what he benefited from the alignment with Tinubu in 2023.

Remove the alignment with Tinubu in 2023, Seyi Makinde was a goner and the fact that he was able to secure a second term in office ought to have been enough for him.

I am also surprised that Governor Makinde didn’t understand that he was advertising his penchant for serial betrayal and greed when he was relating the events that shaped his re-election in 2023.

It was all about him and the decisions he took, not only affected the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP alone, it also affected certain candidates of his party during the first ballot in 2023.

Now, to the issue of Local Government Autonomy.

Governor Seyi Makinde is a very funny individual. He was very clear about his position on Local Government Autonomy in 2023.

His position was that he never even believed in their existence and I was amused when the birthday boy was saying that despite his position on Local Government Autonomy in 2023, he was still able to win in 31 Local Governments, signifying the fact that the people of Oyo state believed Governor Makinde’s explanations.

I am extremely happy that Governor Seyi Makinde has not changed his opinion on how Local Governments should operate within the Federating units.

He is still stuck on the fact that the 33 Local Governments in Oyo state should be appendages to the State Government, even, in spite of the Judgment of the Supreme Court granting them full financial autonomy.

I am shocked that Governor Seyi Makinde could attempt to confuse what happened between the Lagos state Government when Tinubu was Governor of the state and the Federal Government during Obasanjo’s period, with the illegalities he has been perpetuating with the resources 33 Local Governments.

There is a clear distinction between both scenarios.

In the case of Tinubu as Governor of Lagos state, the Lagos state Government created more Local Governments and the Federal Government was of the opinion that the state Government was wrong to have done so.

As a result of this misunderstanding, the Federal Government stopped the monthly allocations for the Local Governments in Lagos state and it led to a Judicial dispute.

In the end, the Supreme Court held that the Local Governments created by the Lagos state Government were incohate, but it faulted the Federal Government for withholding the monthly allocations belonging to the Local Governments in Lagos state.

Lagos state Government thereafter recognized and administered the newly created Local Governments as Local Government Development Areas and many states have since copied the template, including Oyo state.

In the present scenario, the president, through the Attorney general of the Federation approached the Supreme Court and sought to secure full financial autonomy for the 774 Local Governments and the Supreme Court agreed to the request.

I have been asking myself, why is it that Governor Seyi Makinde is having problems with that judgement?

The monthly allocations released to the 33 Local Governments are released against their names.

Is Governor Seyi Makinde saying that it is proper for a Governor to still be the supervisor for the 33 Local Governments?

How does the judgment of the Supreme Court translate to the Federal Government trying to take control of the 774 Local Governments?

Yorubas will always say that a dog can not stand watch over two different buildings. ( Aja kii roro, ko so ojule meji po).

I was also surprised to hear Governor Seyi Makinde talking about the fact that, instead of full financial autonomy for the Local Governments, he preferred to discuss about how the Local Governments could be empowered to survive without monthly allocations from Abuja.

Haba! Governor Makinde!! Gently now.

You are depriving the Local Governments of their entitlements and you except them to thrive. How would that happen?

Why didn’t we start with the state? Can Oyo state survive without monthly allocations?

I think everyone can now see that Bimbo Adekambi as Governor, would never allow the Local Governments to breathe.

On the other hand, Senator Sarafadeen Abiodun Alli has promised to guarantee full financial autonomy for the 33 Local Governments and the implementation of the policy requires no rocket science. All it requires is the will.

There is an existing judgment of the Supreme Court which has outlined the steps to be taken by any willing state Government.

Sarafa Alli only needs to direct relevant stakeholders at the Local Governments to comply with the judgment and that is the end of the matter.

What is so difficult in that, if you are not covetous?

I might have to do this piece in series but I will like to warn the residents of the Circular Road.

You heard Governor Seyi Makinde. He is promising you nothing.

My only problem with him is his attempts to shift the blame of the chaos he orchestrated at the Circular Road on the late Governor Abiola Ajimobi.

He even said that that the Government of Ajimobi defrauded residents of the Circular Road!

Sometimes, people like Governor Seyi Makinde needs no one to enchant them. Their character is an enchantment on itself.

If you’re saying that the Governments of the late Ajimobi defrauded residents of the Circular Road, is Bimbo Adekambi not an integral part of that Government and that is before you begin to ask the Governor for proofs.

I enjoyed Governor Seyi Makinde’s valedictory Media Chat, while looking forward to the new era awaiting him next year.

My father used to tell us that the mouth of the liar does not ooze blood. ( Enu opuro kii seje).

By the way, I saw that Governor Seyi Makinde never mentioned anything about the report of the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into the abduction of Teachers and Pupils of Yawota and Esinele communities of Oriire Local Government.

How far now?

Sola Abegunde.

Continue Reading

Trending