Connect with us

Crime & Court

PMS: Court picks Jan 18 for judgment in Contractor, Oyo govt. suits

Published

on

An Oyo State High Court sitting in Ibadan has fixed January 18, 2021 for judgement in a suit filed by a contractor, Mr Olufemi Oniyide of Moxharley Nigeria Limited against the state government over alleged intellectual property theft with respect to the Park Management System (PMS) in the state.

Justice Munta Abimbola fixed the date for judgment  after parties adopted their written addresses and processes as their arguments in the matter.

Mega Icon Magazine reports that Mr. Olufemi Oniyide through his counsel, Olamiji Martins Esq, had earlier written the Oyo State Governor,  Engr. Seyi Makinde  

sometimes in February 2019 alleging that the Park Management System (PMS) currently in use by the state government was his idea which he submitted to the office of the Governor through his Chief of Staff, Chief Luqman Oyebisi Ilaka.

According to Oniyide , when the state government refused to look into the merit of his case, he took the matter to the Oyo State High Court sitting in Ibadan.

The matter with suit number I/421/2020 was filed on 14th May 2020 by Olamiji Martins Esq. and heard by Justice Munta Abimbola sitting in Court 1.

Oyo State Government, Attorney General of Oyo State, Chief Luqman Oyebisi Ilaka, Commissioner for Public Infrastructure and Transportation and Oyo State Board of Internal Revenue were sued as Defendants.

On the first day the matter came up in court, which was 21st May 2020, Justice Abimbola called the case ‘a novel matter’

On 10th August 2020, Oniyide’s lawyers, Olamiji Martins Esq. and Aborisade Adedayo Victor Esq. amended their Writ of Summons, Statement of Claim and Oniyide’s Oath. In the amended process, Oniyide through his lawyers alleged that the Oyo State government is liable under the Common Law Tort of Passing-Off, breach of contract and retroactive ratification under the law of agency having launched the unregistered proposal submitted by Oniyide as if it were that of Oyo State.

The Defendants were initially represented by the Director of Civil Litigation, Oyo State Ministry of Justice, Mrs. F. B. Segun-Olakojo Esq. who filed a memorandum of appearance on 3rd of June 2020.

However, Olakojo Esq. was replaced by another lawyer, Banjo Aiyenakin Esq. who is from Ondo State.

In open court, it was mentioned that Olakojo Esq was debriefed by the Attorney General of Oyo State, Prof. Oyelowo Oyewo SAN because the matter is a political matter. Aiyenakin Esq filed the Defendants’ Amended Joint Statement of Defence on 23rd September 2020.

On 23rd September 2020 Olamiji Martins Esq. opened the case for the Claimants and called Olufemi Oniyide who was the single witness.

Aiyenakin Esq. for the Defendants also called a single witness, Engineer Abayomi Oluwarotimi Atunbi, a Director at the Ministry of Public Works and Transports.

It was the case of the Claimants that the submission of the proposal to the Defendants constitutes an offer in law.

The launching of the same proposal constitutes an acceptance by conduct irrespective of the change in name.

He relied on the case recently won by the late Ibadan Billionaire, Chief Harry Akande against Shoprite Checkers Limited at the Court of Appeal, Lagos division.

Although , the Defense lawyer, Aiyenakin Esq argued that the Park Management System (PMS) was the idea of Governor Seyi Makinde, adding that the governor  brought the idea from Europe. He maintained that the governor had the Park Management System (PMS) in the pipeline when he was campaigning in 2019.

Meanwhile, Justice Munta Abimbola called back the parties on 2nd December 2020 and 16th December 2020 for further address on the issue of jurisdiction as raised by the Defendants. He asked counsel to the Claimants whether the Oyo State High Court has jurisdiction to entertain a matter bothering on Passing-Off.

In his arguments, counsel to the  claimants, Olamiji Martins Esq. responded by citing the Supreme Court case of Ayman Enterprises Limited v. Akuma Industries Limited to the effect that since Oniyide’s proposal as submitted to the Oyo State government wasn’t registered, a fact admitted under cross examination, passing-off right of action didnt arise from the infringement of any federal enactment and therefore the Federal High Court would not have jurisdiction to entertain the matter but Oyo State High Court.

Defendants’ lawyer, Aiyenakin argued that the Oyo State High Court doesn’t have jurisdiction to entertain the matter and placed heavy reliance on Section. 251(1)(f) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) adding that the Federal High Court is conferred with the jurisdiction to entertain matter related to copyright, patent, trademark and passing-off.

He, therefore urged the court to strike out the matter.

But, when asked to reply by Justice Abimbola, counsel to the  claimants, Martins Esq argued that the Constitution didnt suggest that an unregistered proposal is at the sole jurisdictional prerogative of the Federal High Court.

Comments

Crime & Court

FCMB staff, ex-worker remanded over alleged $25,000 cyber fraud

Published

on

A Federal High Court in Lagos has ordered the remand of a Service Administrator with First City Monument Bank Plc, Gideon Bakpa Aghogho, and a former employee of the bank, Oscar Ebere Chukwuebuka, over an alleged $25,000 cyber fraud.

Justice Friday Ogazi gave the order on Wednesday following the arraignment of the two men by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission on charges bordering on conspiracy, cybercrime and fraud.

The EFCC alleged that Aghogho, Chukwuebuka and a man identified as Scott, who is still at large, conspired between July 24 and 26, 2026, to gain unauthorised access to the bank’s server and siphon $25,000.

The prosecution counsel, Bilikisu Buhari-Bala, told the court that Aghogho allegedly released his access code to Chukwuebuka, who was said to have approached him to facilitate access to the bank’s system.

According to the prosecutor, the access code, which was linked to the bank’s local Administrative Credential, known as ITSD, was allegedly used to gain access to the FCMB Virtual Centre Platform.
Buhari-Bala further alleged that after the money was siphoned, Aghogho received $2,000, while Chukwuebuka allegedly received $400.

The prosecutor said the alleged offences violated provisions of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc) Act, 2015, as amended in 2024, and the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

When the charges were read to them, Aghogho pleaded not guilty, while Chukwuebuka pleaded guilty.
Following their pleas, Justice Ogazi adjourned the case until August 27, 2026, for a review of the facts relating to the charges against Chukwuebuka.

The judge also ordered that the two defendants be remanded in the custody of the Nigerian Correctional Service pending the next hearing.

Before the arraignment, counsel to the defendants, N. Egah and Livingstone Madu, told the court that their clients were willing to enter into a plea bargain agreement.

The prosecutor, however, said the EFCC was not aware of any plea bargain arrangement involving the defendants.
One of the counts alleged that Aghogho, Chukwuebuka and Scott conspired to provide and use Aghogho’s access code to the FCMB system, thereby enabling unauthorised access to the bank’s Virtual Centre Platform.

Another count accused Aghogho of unlawfully disclosing access credentials, including the bank’s server IP and domain credentials, which allegedly facilitated access to the bank’s database.

The EFCC also alleged that Aghogho retained $2,000 on July 26, 2026, while Chukwuebuka retained $400, knowing or having reasonable grounds to believe that the sums were proceeds of an unlawful act.

The defendants have not been convicted of the allegations.

The case was adjourned until August 27 for further proceedings.

Continue Reading

Crime & Court

Police Arrest 10 Suspected Human Parts Dealers in Oyo

Published

on

Operatives of the Oyo State Police Command have arrested 10 suspected human parts dealers in Iseyin and Saki areas of the state following months of intelligence gathering and surveillance.

The suspects were arrested by the Command’s Monitoring Unit after operatives had closely monitored their activities, the Police Public Relations Officer, DSP Ayanlade Olayinka, disclosed in a statement made available to journalists on Friday.

According to the statement, the arrests followed “sustained intelligence gathering, discreet surveillance and close monitoring” of the suspects.

Those arrested were Adam Ibrahim, 42; Nasiru Kabiru, 22; Tijani Wasiu, 54; Abiola Nasiru, 45; Amusa Gbadamosi, 57; Raheem Taofeek, 46; Jimoh Muritala, 35; Suleiman Busari, 47; Ganiyu Nurudeen, 36; and Usman Abdullahi, 52.

Police said several suspected human parts and charms were recovered during searches of the suspects’ hideouts.

The exhibits included a suspected human heart, human flesh, pieces of human skull and assorted charms.

The command said the recovered items had been secured for forensic examination as investigations continued.

Olayinka said the suspects had confessed to dealing in human parts for ritual purposes, adding that they were assisting investigators in tracing the source, procurement and intended use of the recovered items.

He said efforts were ongoing to arrest other members of the alleged syndicate.

The Commissioner of Police, Oyo State Command, CP Abimbola Ayodeji Olugbenga, commended the operatives for what he described as a painstaking intelligence-led operation.

The CP reaffirmed the command’s determination to rid the state of criminal elements and protect the sanctity of human life.

He urged residents to remain vigilant and provide credible information to the police to aid crime prevention and detection.

 

Continue Reading

Crime & Court

Ex-DSS Officer Arraigned Over Alleged IPOB Membership, Terror Charges

Published

on

The Department of State Services has arraigned one of its retired officers, Nwaogu Ihechimere Ezeakolam, before the Federal High Court in Abuja over his alleged involvement with the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra.

Ezeakolam was docked before Justice Mohammed Umar on a four-count charge bordering on alleged membership of the separatist group, providing support for its activities and using social media to promote its cause.

The charges were instituted by the Director of Public Prosecutions of the Federation, Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN), on behalf of the Federal Government. The prosecution alleged that the offences were committed in Abuja and Abia State between 2025 and 2026.

According to the charge, the retired operative allegedly rendered moral support to IPOB by disseminating information in favour of the group through the internet and his social media platforms. The prosecution said the action contravened provisions of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

The Federal Government also accused him of becoming a member of IPOB despite the group’s proscription by the court. It maintained that the alleged act is punishable under the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act.

In another count, the prosecution alleged that Ezeakolam knowingly posted messages on social media designed to persuade members of the public to support IPOB. It further claimed that the posts amounted to aiding and abetting the activities of the proscribed organisation.

The fourth charge accused the defendant of publishing messages online to advance the cause of IPOB, an offence the prosecution said is contrary to the provisions of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act, 2015, as amended.

When the charges were read, Ezeakolam pleaded not guilty to all four counts. Following his plea, prosecuting counsel, Memunat Oladunjoye, urged the court to fix a date for the commencement of trial.

Counsel for the defendant, Godfirst Maduka, informed the court that he intended to file a bail application on behalf of his client. Justice Umar directed that the application should be filed accordingly and fixed October 29 for the commencement of trial.

The judge subsequently ordered that the defendant be remanded in the Kuje Custodial Centre pending the hearing and determination of his bail application.

Continue Reading

Advertisement

Entertainment

Advertisement

MegaIcon Magazine Facebook Page

Advertisement

MEGAICON TV

Advertisement

Trending